<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Don&#8217;t Like Happy-Go-Lucky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.halfpastnoon.com/2008/11/why-i-dont-like-happy-go-lucky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.halfpastnoon.com/2008/11/why-i-dont-like-happy-go-lucky/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Responding to Frank on Happy-Go-Lucky Half Past Noon</title>
		<link>http://www.halfpastnoon.com/2008/11/why-i-dont-like-happy-go-lucky/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Responding to Frank on Happy-Go-Lucky Half Past Noon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfpastnoon.com/?p=1337#comment-970</guid>
		<description>[...] Responding to Frank&#8217;s critique of Happy-Go-Lucky. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Responding to Frank&#8217;s critique of Happy-Go-Lucky. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.halfpastnoon.com/2008/11/why-i-dont-like-happy-go-lucky/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfpastnoon.com/?p=1337#comment-937</guid>
		<description>Austin,

I still want to see the movie. Hows about you give me a few reasons for why you liked it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Austin,</p>
<p>I still want to see the movie. Hows about you give me a few reasons for why you liked it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F</title>
		<link>http://www.halfpastnoon.com/2008/11/why-i-dont-like-happy-go-lucky/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfpastnoon.com/?p=1337#comment-936</guid>
		<description>Austin,

I wasn&#039;t so much criticizing Poppy for &lt;em&gt;not being a Christian&lt;/em&gt;, as I was calling her (or Mike Leigh?) a liar. Leigh gives her all this happiness and says, &quot;Look, she does it all by her self, pure will!&quot;

To which I say, &quot;Not so! You, sir, lie.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Austin,</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t so much criticizing Poppy for <em>not being a Christian</em>, as I was calling her (or Mike Leigh?) a liar. Leigh gives her all this happiness and says, &#8220;Look, she does it all by her self, pure will!&#8221;</p>
<p>To which I say, &#8220;Not so! You, sir, lie.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://www.halfpastnoon.com/2008/11/why-i-dont-like-happy-go-lucky/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfpastnoon.com/?p=1337#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Frank, I can&#039;t believe you just criticized the protagonist for &lt;em&gt;not being a Christian.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, I can&#8217;t believe you just criticized the protagonist for <em>not being a Christian.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.halfpastnoon.com/2008/11/why-i-dont-like-happy-go-lucky/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfpastnoon.com/?p=1337#comment-934</guid>
		<description>I will add to this a conversation D and I had about the movie the morning after. I should note, at the outset, that I reference Austin&#039;s wife and one other young lady acquaintance of ours. Lest they get lumped in with the insufferable hero of &lt;i&gt;Happy Go Lucky,&lt;/i&gt; I include the following qualification: I love both girls dearly and value them highly for their spunk and cheery dispositions. The similarities between my friends and Poppy Cross ultimately break down due to the inhuman orders of magnitude to which she takes otherwise lovely personality traits.

9:51:02 AM C: Eh,
9:51:05 AM C: we didn&#039;t HATE it,
9:51:11 AM D: F did
9:51:14 AM C: but it was one of those garbage pomo movies,
9:51:18 AM D: lol
9:51:25 AM C: where you&#039;re like &quot;Ah! the protagonist is such a beautiful person,
9:51:33 AM C: if only they didn&#039;t live in such an ugly world!&quot;
9:51:46 AM D: Is that pomo?
9:51:49 AM C: Yeah.
9:52:07 AM C: Fundamental ontological conflict between character and universe,
9:52:10 AM C: I haven&#039;t ironed it out,
9:52:15 AM C: but I think it&#039;s a basic tenet of pomo literature.
9:52:32 AM C: Look no farther than Foer and books like The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime,
9:52:38 AM C: Virgin Suicides,
9:52:40 AM C: stuff like that.
9:52:43 AM D: Hm
9:53:01 AM D: Sounds Dickensian.
9:53:03 AM C: It&#039;s narrative tension,
9:53:04 AM C: you know,
9:53:09 AM C: with no metanarrative,
9:53:17 AM C: we can&#039;t have principled conflict and resolution,
9:53:24 AM C: it all originates in the individual,
9:53:25 AM D: Gotcha
9:53:43 AM C: and they still haven&#039;t figured out how to end a good pomo story without killing off the protagonist entirely,
9:53:53 AM C: it&#039;s the only honest form of relief.
9:53:58 AM C: Anyways,
9:54:04 AM D: What about Stranger Than Fiction?
9:54:13 AM C: this movie ends with her rowing a boat and talking to her boyfriend,
9:54:26 AM C: with whom she has had serendipitous and unpassionate sex a single time.
9:54:31 AM C: It was stirring, really,
9:54:39 AM C: that phone conversation was.
9:55:18 AM D: hm?
9:55:22 AM D: phone?
9:55:24 AM C: Oh,
9:55:37 AM C: she talked to her new boyfriend on a cell phone while she rowed a boat.
9:55:46 AM D: Ah.
9:55:58 AM D: Why did Austin like it?
9:56:25 AM C: I dunno,
9:56:34 AM C: the girl was very bubbly and unflappable,
9:56:53 AM C: admirably chipper but ultimately irritatingly so,
9:57:07 AM D: Hm.
9:57:14 AM D: It&#039;s gotten almost universally good reviews
9:57:22 AM D: Confusing
9:57:28 AM C: like a caricature of his wife or her sisters.
9:57:41 AM D: lol
9:57:44 AM C: Like Cat B without any self control.
9:57:50 AM C: There were some good moments,
9:57:55 AM C: don&#039;t get me wrong,
9:58:25 AM C: pomoism is certainly capable of poignancy, but like existentialism, comes up sort on answers.
9:58:39 AM D: Mhm
9:58:41 AM C: I dunno,
9:58:54 AM C: the protagonist (Poppy Cross) made me feel really panicky,
9:59:11 AM C: she was the type of person that always saw beautiful things and got excited and distracted by them,
9:59:22 AM C: and pulled them, disorderly, into her orbit until they floated back out,
9:59:40 AM D: Hm.
9:59:43 AM C: so she was always wearing mismatched and flowing clothing, twisted stockings, and bracelets that jangled incessantly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will add to this a conversation D and I had about the movie the morning after. I should note, at the outset, that I reference Austin&#8217;s wife and one other young lady acquaintance of ours. Lest they get lumped in with the insufferable hero of <i>Happy Go Lucky,</i> I include the following qualification: I love both girls dearly and value them highly for their spunk and cheery dispositions. The similarities between my friends and Poppy Cross ultimately break down due to the inhuman orders of magnitude to which she takes otherwise lovely personality traits.</p>
<p>9:51:02 AM C: Eh,<br />
9:51:05 AM C: we didn&#8217;t HATE it,<br />
9:51:11 AM D: F did<br />
9:51:14 AM C: but it was one of those garbage pomo movies,<br />
9:51:18 AM D: lol<br />
9:51:25 AM C: where you&#8217;re like &#8220;Ah! the protagonist is such a beautiful person,<br />
9:51:33 AM C: if only they didn&#8217;t live in such an ugly world!&#8221;<br />
9:51:46 AM D: Is that pomo?<br />
9:51:49 AM C: Yeah.<br />
9:52:07 AM C: Fundamental ontological conflict between character and universe,<br />
9:52:10 AM C: I haven&#8217;t ironed it out,<br />
9:52:15 AM C: but I think it&#8217;s a basic tenet of pomo literature.<br />
9:52:32 AM C: Look no farther than Foer and books like The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime,<br />
9:52:38 AM C: Virgin Suicides,<br />
9:52:40 AM C: stuff like that.<br />
9:52:43 AM D: Hm<br />
9:53:01 AM D: Sounds Dickensian.<br />
9:53:03 AM C: It&#8217;s narrative tension,<br />
9:53:04 AM C: you know,<br />
9:53:09 AM C: with no metanarrative,<br />
9:53:17 AM C: we can&#8217;t have principled conflict and resolution,<br />
9:53:24 AM C: it all originates in the individual,<br />
9:53:25 AM D: Gotcha<br />
9:53:43 AM C: and they still haven&#8217;t figured out how to end a good pomo story without killing off the protagonist entirely,<br />
9:53:53 AM C: it&#8217;s the only honest form of relief.<br />
9:53:58 AM C: Anyways,<br />
9:54:04 AM D: What about Stranger Than Fiction?<br />
9:54:13 AM C: this movie ends with her rowing a boat and talking to her boyfriend,<br />
9:54:26 AM C: with whom she has had serendipitous and unpassionate sex a single time.<br />
9:54:31 AM C: It was stirring, really,<br />
9:54:39 AM C: that phone conversation was.<br />
9:55:18 AM D: hm?<br />
9:55:22 AM D: phone?<br />
9:55:24 AM C: Oh,<br />
9:55:37 AM C: she talked to her new boyfriend on a cell phone while she rowed a boat.<br />
9:55:46 AM D: Ah.<br />
9:55:58 AM D: Why did Austin like it?<br />
9:56:25 AM C: I dunno,<br />
9:56:34 AM C: the girl was very bubbly and unflappable,<br />
9:56:53 AM C: admirably chipper but ultimately irritatingly so,<br />
9:57:07 AM D: Hm.<br />
9:57:14 AM D: It&#8217;s gotten almost universally good reviews<br />
9:57:22 AM D: Confusing<br />
9:57:28 AM C: like a caricature of his wife or her sisters.<br />
9:57:41 AM D: lol<br />
9:57:44 AM C: Like Cat B without any self control.<br />
9:57:50 AM C: There were some good moments,<br />
9:57:55 AM C: don&#8217;t get me wrong,<br />
9:58:25 AM C: pomoism is certainly capable of poignancy, but like existentialism, comes up sort on answers.<br />
9:58:39 AM D: Mhm<br />
9:58:41 AM C: I dunno,<br />
9:58:54 AM C: the protagonist (Poppy Cross) made me feel really panicky,<br />
9:59:11 AM C: she was the type of person that always saw beautiful things and got excited and distracted by them,<br />
9:59:22 AM C: and pulled them, disorderly, into her orbit until they floated back out,<br />
9:59:40 AM D: Hm.<br />
9:59:43 AM C: so she was always wearing mismatched and flowing clothing, twisted stockings, and bracelets that jangled incessantly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

